Niwot Ridge LTER Snow Report for May 2003
Spring Greetings!

The signs of spring are clear and unmistakable at C1, Niwot Ridge, now. The 
snowpack is dense, the storms are often quick and intense, the ground is 
bare one day, covered with a foot of snow the next and bare again two days 
later, and the hummingbirds returned (May 12th at C1).

The snowpack at C1 on 15 May 2003 contained 11.44 inches of snow water equivalent 
(SWE), was 30 inches deep, and had an average density of about 38%. (In contrast 
with winter densities more in the range of 20-25%). This May 15th ranks as one of 
the top 5 or 6 years in the past 20 by my hand measurements. (Many years there is 
no snow at C1 on this date - see record at the end of this message).

The snowpack was bolstered by an event on May 9-10 which was characterised by a 
nice low to our south and high to the north at 850 mb, resulting in a strong 
upslope circulation that dropped 1.62" SWE at C1. This raised the snowpack from 
about 110% to 142%. This illustrates another sign of spring, the rapidly changing 
snowpack numbers, pointing to cautious interpretation of the percentages at this 
time of year (just like in the fall when relatively small changes in absolute 
change yield large precentage changes). For example, on May 12th, C1 SWE was 
12.6" and on May 15th it was 11.0" (138% of average), according to Snotel.

For the statewide perspective, the NRCS Snotel reports the South Platte basin 
with 124% of average SWE and 108% of average winter cummulative precipitation 
(PPT), which is tops in the state. The Upper Colorado is close with 122% and 
103% (SWE and PPT, respectively).

The lowest basins continue to be in southwestern Colorado, the Upper Rio Grande 
(42% SWE and 82% PPT), and the San Juan, Animas, Dolores, San Miguel group (46% 
SWE and 76% PPT). This has been the case all season, and as Martin Hoerling 
pointed out, may be particularly worrisome for this region because there was 
hope forit to recieve much more moisture this season, given the El Nino conditions. 
With the suggestion of the return of La Nina next winter, there is much less cause 
for optimism that this area will catch up on their moisture deficit anytime soon.

The Laramie/N. Platte, and Yampa/White basins are healthy with above 100% snowpacks 
and SWE/PPT ratios greater than 1 (more of the winter precipitation is sequestered 
in the snowpack than average), but the Arkansas and Gunnison basin SWE's are less 
than average (89% and 73%, respectively) and their SWE/PPT ratios are less than 
one (less of their winter water has remained in the snowpack).

In the western US, storms in the past few weeks have bolstered the percentages, 
in general (but as noted above, at this time of year, they should not be taken 
too seriously). Only Alaska, Utah, NM, and Arizona snowpacks missed out. 
Snowpack in these states continue to be less to much less than average and 
with SWE/PPT ratios of less than one. Idaho, Montana, California, and Nevada 
have snowpacks greater than 100% and ratios greater than one. Oregon snowpack 
is mixed ranging from 0 to 132%, but ratios generally less than one. Wyoming 
is also a bit mixed, but generally average, and ratios greater than one.

So, this 2002-2003 winter snowpack season has turned out to be pretty good
overall, especially for Colorado to fill reservoirs that supply much of 
its population centers (with the exception of the SW region). However, 
it in no way has ended the drought much of the west is suffering though. 
A few more wet winters are most likely needed before the drought could 
be declared over. There is hope for a shorter and possibly less explosive 
fire season this summer, though.

The hand mesurement records at C1 follow, and there will be one more 
mailing this season reporting meltout date at C1.

Cheers! Mark

Sno Tel Data Niwot Ridge, C-1 Snow Water Content (inches) Values are for the end of given month except as noted for May and June
Season Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 81/82 4.75 10.5 11.75 15.5 14.9 12.0 (17th) 82/83 3.63 4.75 12.75 17 11.75 (30th) 83/84 12.6 13.25 15 18.9 20.75 84/85 3.75 6.25 8.5 10.25 8.75 85/86 6.5 7.5 14 15.38 17.5 86/87 6.25 8.75 11.25 12.75 11.75 87/88 6.5 9.1 12.4 15.75 14.5 88/89 5.5 7.6 11 10.25 5.6 89/90 6.5 9.25 10.75 16.1 16.5 90/91 3 5 7.1 9.38 10 91/92 6.65 6.75 8.5 12.25 10.25 92/93 5.75 6.75 10.75 14 15.875 93/94 7.125 9.063 12.25 13.25 13.25 2.5 (18th) 94/95 2.625 3.925 7.0 10.125 16.75 17.0 (22nd) 12.375(13th) 19.75(30th) 95/96 7.50 12.00 17.5 20.375 18.75 6.125 (15th) 96/97 8.75 12.625 15.125 14.625 20.375 18.0 (15th) 97/98 7.0625 10.0 10.125 12.875 17.25 12.875 (15th) 98/99 3.25 6.625 8.375 9.125 14.125 14.25 (15th) 99/2000 3.5 7.5 10.625 12.375 7.625 00/2001 4.375 5.375 7.125 10.00 9.125 01/2002 2.625 4.25 6.19 7.563 0.0 02/2003 4.00 5.25 8.5 16.75 14.375 11.44 (15th) Average 5.554 7.967 10.389 13.197 13.409

Return to Snow Report Page

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement
#DEB-9810218.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the author(s) and do not necesarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Please contact lternwt@colorado.edu with questions, comments, or for technical assistance regarding this web site.