Return to Snow Report Page

Niwot Ridge LTER Snow Report for Feb 2007
Niwot Ridge LTER Snow Report for February 28th, 2007

Greetings! The snowpack at Niwot Ridge (C1) for the end of February remains above average. State wide, The Front Range snowpack is above average, and the snowpack in the western half of the state is less than average. Across the West, Washington and New Mexico remain the only states with above average SWE.

Hand measurements made on February 28th, 2007 show 14.375 inches of Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) for 139% of the 1982-2007 average hand measurements, and a snow depth of 50.75 inches. This is the 4th highest end of February SWE measurement in this record. SNOTEL is reporting 13.4 inches of SWE for 137% of average.

The South Platte River Basin is at 111% of average SWE, and 111% of average total accumulated precipitation. State wide the Arkansas River Basin has the highest percent of average SWE; the San Miguel, Dolores, Animas and San Juan River Basins have the lowest percent of average SWE (115%, 76% respectively). The South Platte River Basin has the highest percent of average total accumulated precipitation; the Yampa and White River Basins also has the lowest percent of average total accumulated precipitation (111%, 89%).

Across the West, the end of February looks very similar to the end of January. Washington remains the only state with above average Percent SWE and above average Percent Accumulated Precipitation (116% SWE, 113% Accum Precip). New Mexico is the only other state with above average percent SWE (108%). Nevada and The California Great Basin sites still have the lowest percent of average SWE (64%, 65%). Arizona has the lowest percent of accumulated precipitation followed by the California Great Basin sites (63%, 71%). The Snowpack Index (SI) is greater than one in Arizona, New Mexico, Washington, the Arkansas River Basin, and the Lower Colorado River Basin, and less than one through out the rest of the Western US.

Until next month

Kurt

Sno Tel Data Niwot Ridge, C-1 Snow Water Content (inches) Values are for the end of given month except as noted for May and June
Season Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 81/82 4.75 10.5 11.75 15.5 14.9 12 (17th) 82/83 3.63 4.75 12.75 17 11.75 (30th) 83/84 12.6 13.25 15 18.9 20.75 84/85 3.75 6.25 8.5 10.25 8.75 85/86 6.5 7.5 14 15.38 17.5 86/87 6.25 8.75 11.25 12.75 11.75 87/88 6.5 9.1 12.4 15.75 14.5 88/89 5.5 7.6 11 10.25 5.6 89/90 6.5 9.25 10.75 16.1 16.5 90/91 3 5 7.1 9.38 10 91/92 6.65 6.75 8.5 12.25 10.25 92/93 5.75 6.75 10.75 14 15.875 93/94 7.125 9.063 12.25 13.25 13.25 2.5 (18th) 94/95 2.625 3.925 7 10.125 16.75 17 (22nd) 12.375(13th) 19.75(30th) 95/96 7.5 12 17.5 20.375 18.75 6.125 (15th) 96/97 8.75 12.625 15.125 14.625 20.375 18 (15th) 97/98 7.0625 10 10.125 12.875 17.25 12.875 (15th) 98/99 3.25 6.625 8.375 9.125 14.125 14.25 (15th) 99/2000 3.5 7.5 10.625 12.375 7.625 00/2001 4.375 5.375 7.125 10 9.125 01/2002 2.625 4.25 6.19 7.563 0 02/2003 4 5.25 8.5 16.75 14.375 11.44 (15th) 03/2004 2.75 4.813 7.75 7.875 10.125 3.69 (14th) 04/2005 4.875 7.7 9.5 11.625 12.875 12.25 (15th) 05/2006 5.625 8.375 9.5 13.25 6.75 0.875 (15th) 06/2007 9.25 11.5 14.375 Average 5.57 7.99 10.37 12.92 12.99

Return to Snow Report Page

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement
#DEB-0423662.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the author(s) and do not necesarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Please contact lternwt@colorado.edu with questions, comments, or for technical assistance regarding this web site.